re: #101 Targetpractice

Exactly. He thinks he’s picking up points with his base by showing “defiance,” while the lickspittles he’s hired keep feeding him BS about how every motion to dismiss, delay, or allow him to intimidate witnesses/court staff that goes nowhere is building a solid case for overturning the verdict on appeal.

Looking forward, assuming he’s convicted, of the appellate court rejecting his appeals because they’ve already been argued and answered.

And DM has a point…if he’s innocent why isn’t he seizing this opportunity to let the evidence show that?