re: #158 robdouth

You’re talking about the level of proof for a conviction and that there is no law against it. Who said there was. There’s also no law against opposing someone who holds certain beliefs, but it looks like someone uptop said that the opposition was even before that, and it was cleared up that it is a weak connection so it doesn’t matter anyway.

Well, that’s part of my point which is that they would have to prove that their conspiracy is real and based on facts instead of right-wing blogger’s rhetoric.