re: #10 jamesfirecat

Ok, that’s great, but it really doesn’t help with what he’s trying to do. Granted Jindal has a lot of other crappy ideas, especially as they relate to creationism, but this idea seems solid and either the media did a shit job of explaining why scientists are against the plan, or the “scientists” were not clear in their criticism of the plan because it sounds solid. I’d like to see the holes in Jindal’s Rock barrier plan though if anyone can explaine it more eloquently than the ABC piece.