re: #169 Thanos

Going away from the nuclear angle, FT is right in that Greenpeace is correct in their saying that it’s probably too little, and that it restrains them from acting.

On the other hand, Greenpeace has been a large factor in the luddite leaning part of the eco movement that has kept us in energy stasis, slave to coal and those foreign dictators all these years…

I have mentioned “waste” a number of times, and the more scientific minded in this group seem to want to ignore it. Color me skeptical, but the most safe operating reactor still produces hot waste, right? And with all our advancements in who we could design and run a plant, I think the waste problem still has the caveats as always.

Or am I missing something?