re: #229 windsagio

random thought, can anyone find a reliable ‘climate scientist’ that DOES question AGW?

Nope. Because ‘reliable” is open you your interpretation, someone else’s interpretation, in general open to interpretations. I’ve seen articles from scientist from MIT to the armchair types, who have trouble with just one model of warming. I’ve seen articles from scientist from MIT to the armchair types, who have no trouble with the standard warming model, but question the foundation causes and I I’ve seen articles from scientist from MIT to the armchair types, who are complete whack cases.

So, I can’t answer your question, nor could I ever possibly satisfy anyone, from any side, on someone else’s opinions.