re: #240 windsagio

Well I used ‘reliable’ ‘cuz I worked 10 hours last night and haven’t really had a chance to sleep, so I couldn’t think of the real word.

“Scientist from MIT” is that just code for ‘really smart qualified person’?

re: #237 WindUpBird

That is true! And I guess it speaks to Walters point I was asking about: Why do these anti AGW people get labeled as ‘non-climate scientists’? Because They’re not expert, and the deniers are digging through the generic scientist bin to find someone… And apparently people don’t understand that ‘scientists’ don’t know about everything.

Do film makers?