re: #214 Walter L. Newton

I do notice, over and over, when there is a reference to some AGW skeptic, or at least a scientist that doesn’t march to the exact same tune as the Hadley/CRU group, then it’s always important to point out that the person is not a climate scientist, instead he/she is a geologist or some other possibly allied regimen, but not a real climate scientist.

But if a person is totally of the “Accepted” school of AGW thought, the person can be a film maker, a geologist, a biologist (Denmark’s Fog) and all sorts of allied scientist.

I wonder if underwear color also figures into the science?

Though I would submit, Walter, that often the person in question is working in their field of expertise. A photographer presenting photographic evidence of climate change is a good source. A photographer analyzing computer models is a less good source.