re: #258 allegro

This film maker needs no defense, unless one is accusing him of photoshopping or falsifying what he presents. He has produced a filmed documentary of what is actually happening along with specific measurements.

But he isn’t a climate scientist. By the logic presented in the original post I was replying to, this is reason to reject the evidence presented in his film.

I shouldn’t have to explain this, but note that I am not attacking the film. I am pointing out a lapse of logic on the part of the original poster, whose statement is a classic case of a non sequitur.