re: #275 sattv4u2

How so?

Playing devils advocate here, but was that photographer at that very same place 10/20/50 years ago? Perhaps the same exact thing happens there every 50 years. A scientist would come up with ways to find out. A cinematographer, not so much

THAT a cinematographer found it to happen at the very time he was there to film it proves only that it happened at the time he was there to film it

AGAIN ,,, devils advocate

You can’t argue with it. If it was a freaking circus clown that agreed with the AGW model, all parts of it, 100 percent, they would be quoted.

Any other opinion, even if it was MORE science than the accepted model, bad. Notice that?

I have never denied AGW, but because I actually refuse to agree with every single thing I have had presented to me, even if I am just in the discovery stage, I’m a denier.