re: #273 allegro

Whoa! It was just a simple statement of understanding what started the stuff about the film and what appeared to be questioning its validity.

I’m not sure what there is to question of the photographer’s credibility. He’s a nature photographer who admits he was skeptical, but once he looked into the science more, was convinced by the evidence. He came up with the idea to do some time lapse photography, and it speaks for itself. What’s there to question?