re: #33 Political Atheist

Trying to square that the above with this part-Unless untrue of course.

It’s not true. He’s a ‘soft’ denier. He doesn’t directly deny AGW, but he does deny that CO2 is the overwhelmingly main forcer, and he denies that reduction efforts are the best way to combat it, instead parroting the incredible unwise and unscientific ‘adaptation’ idea that is popular in right-wing circles.

You get the difference between a ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ denier, right? And that this guy is not a scientist?