re: #370 Pythagoras

really, then how Pythagoras does this say that the basic science of AGW is not settled? I defined what I meant by that upthread.

How does this refute CO2 as a GHG or as the primary driver of AGW?

How does this affect the primary feedback mechanisms?

I;ll be honest and say that the ozone hole which incidently was also man caused does play a role in AGW models, but how does this paper unsettle the science?

As usual you are writing some pretty unscientific stuff.