re: #377 Pythagoras

You are correct — I stand corrected. Since you did not claim in 284 that CO2 is the dominant driver of climate change, the article does not refute what you said. The article (which according to the link has been accepted after peer review) does challenge the theory that CO2 is the dominant driver of climate change — a claim made by some on this thread. Still, you are right, the BASIC science that CO2 is a greenhouse gas is not challenged by this paper.

As for the insult — it’s beneath you. I usually enjoy this more.

Oh no, I said very clearly that the science is quite settled that CO2 is the dominant driver. I stand by that.

This paper does not change that. Not even close.