re: #373 LudwigVanQuixote

I find it very interesting that you used to hold up the IPCC report as evidence of my “alarmism” when I pointed out the flaws of its science that came in from political wrangling… now you are dismissing the whole thing… Unlike you Bagua - or Walter, I have actually read it. Further, I have read the original papers that it draws from.

Correct Ludwig, I fully acknowledge that I used to accept the IPCC AR4 as credible and that was my position. That has changed as the new evidence has emerged. Unlike you, I read things, absorb new facts and modify my positions when I find new information to contradict my views. You however, just circle the wagons and shout down and insult your opponents.

Now, you say you’ve “read the original papers” so you must be referring to all the WWF and Greenpeace agiprop that the AR4 is riddled with.

Of course that level of consistency of thought is not to be expected from you. You are, after all, an idiot and a consistent liar

You are talking into a mirror again you alarmist phony.