re: #498 realwest

Why did she have to rule the way she did?

re: #504 Occasional Reader

Huh?

Source, please?

re: #499 Nevergiveup

Because Title VII says what it says, and to rule otherwise than she did in Ricci would have meant legislating from the bench. She punted. She kicked it up to the high court, rather than ‘making law’. This is the opposite of judicial activism, and frankly, is a reason why conservatives and moderates ought to like her appointment.

slate.com