re: #60 ProLifeLiberal

He’s been the most aggressive in the US in regards to trying to hamper the rebels, and protect Qaddafi.

I think you have to at least accept that his aim was not to “protect Qaddafi” as much as to stop the US from fighting a war that he felt we had no business fighting.

For all of Ron Paul’s craziness, I don’t hold his anti-war positions against him either.

The idea that congress must always fall in line behind whatever foreign adventure the executive launches is unattractive to me.