re: #6 wrenchwench

So at least the judge is sure that if the fetus is already dead, it’s unconstitutional. Roe v Wade says the woman with a live fetus may not be impeded either. But the judge is leaving a little wiggle room for the ‘legitimate right of the state in preserving and promoting fetal life’. That right does not come in to play until viability, according to Roe. The state has no right in ‘preserving and promoting’ embryonic life, nor that of a non-viable fetus. The 20-week thing should have been struck down too.

But BABY!!!!! And also, slut.