re: #65 Occasional Reader

As I noted yesterday, there were several ads that had “violence” in them. Remember the hysterics a couple years back over allegedly “violent” Superbowl ads? The pundits were screaming that this proved that Bush’s AmeriKKKa had become more callous about violence because of the imperialistic war in Iraq, etc. etc.

I sure didn’t see any such reactions in today’s press, did you?

I saw one, and the readers were giving the author all the respect he deserved in the comments. I’d link if I could find it again.