re: #130 jamesfirecat

Here’s what it breaks down to Buck.

Do you have a problem with the government putting money forward to paying for abortions of girls who suffered statutory rape or women who were date rapped?

I do not. And I don’t think the bill in question does either. I feel that a court would define all rape as forcible, if it were to come to that.

‘The limitations established in sections 301, 302, 303, and 304 shall not apply to an abortion—

‘(1) if the pregnancy occurred because the pregnant female was the subject of an act of forcible rape or, if a minor, an act of incest; or
1
‘(2) in the case where the pregnant female suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness that would, as certified by a physician, place the pregnant female in danger of death unless an abortion is performed, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself.