re: #218 FemNaziBitch

I’ve come to believe it is wrong to use deadly force to defend property. The only exception might be arson.

Unless one is in danger of losing the roof over one’s head or a car if one is in an isolated place during bad weather or treacherous conditions, I can’t see property being worth a life.

It has to be truly self-defense.

In our tae kwon do self-defense seminars, we’re taught that if they’re demanding our wallet or cell phone, it’s better to just hand it over rather than risk actual physical harm by engaging. It’s only if the assailant is attempting physical harm (a rapist) or attempting to coerce to leave the location of initial assault (chances of survival drop dramatically once you get taken away) that we are encouraged to defend ourselves.