Ie, you don’t attack my ideas, you look for semantic traps. As if when I say that something is not significant, you pretend that into me saying that it doesn’t exist at all, and then you use the minor falshood as an excuse to accuse me of bigotry.

It’s a stupid trick that only works because your audience doesn’t care to read every word, doesn’t care to understand them, and just wants their simplistic comfortable lines of demarcation between acceptable speech and that from their right wing enemies. You don’t want to have to understand what you read before you condemn it, that would take effort.