re: #221 allegro

I’m not seeing anything about recusals there. Are you suggesting that a judge who has accepted corporate money will always and automatically own up to it and recuse him/herself from the case?

CU isn’t about direct donations. It’s about third party groups being able to spend all they want on behalf of a candidate. That’s what makes it so corrosive: the spending is decoupled from the person on whose behalf it is spent.