re: #255 Nyet

It was also a threat, if not a fully serious one. Nothing wrong with reporting it as such by any standard.

The report specified “threat” as one of violence, which for someone who’s followed Chuck and understands the context, was a stretch at best. But again, I didn’t care, when a person says shit like that, which can be reasonably interpreted as a violent threat then they own it. Context, in that context (heh) becomes sort of irrelevant.

And again, even as I concede it’s not what he meant, it could easily be what one of his more unhinged followers inferred. As such it was massively irresponsible.