re: #247 recusancy

Yes I do believe that the overwhelming evidence does show that CO2 can act as a GHG. I think my main point is we have a lot of things that are showing the possibility of some impact by man kind on global climate. Where I differ is the belief that there is a catastrophe on the horizon unless we fix this. I also differ with the narcissistic belief that man can control nature.

I think we should take steps to improve our environment. However the current push of global warming remediation initiatives are so over the top with minimal to no impact on the perceived problem that it looks like complete hysteria.

We currently have serious environmental problems that have been proven to cause major negative impact on life on earth for which we have been able to remedy with great success when we take action.

PCB cleanup, Arsenic Cleanup, Clean water, Storm water remediation, wetland rehabilitation, forest rehabilitation, and many others. It has been proven that if we don’t do something about these conditions soon it will negatively effect life on earth. Some even speculate it could end life for higher forms of life particularly PCB contamination’s generational mutation of sexual organs in high mammalian life forms.