re: #290 LudwigVanQuixote

re: #285 Bagua

It is OK.

I completely understand how you would be upset at this issue, knowing how large it apparently is, and then having me come in and make a bad analysis based on a faulty perception of the actual state of things.

It is obviously vastly bigger as a problem than I gave it credit for. If the paper from Jay was so faulty that it was off by a factor of ten, and it were only hundreds of cases in America alone, it would still be a giant problem and you had every right to get cranky at my ignorance.

I truly had no idea it was that bad.

Please let this be a teachable moment. :)

I know full well how large and issue AGW actually is and have the exact same response you just did, when faced with the angry and faulty analysis of others.

As do I.