re: #296 LudwigVanQuixote

DID you read the ten papers about accelerated melts that IPCC did not take into account from 2009 that I have given you? The paper you keep talking about is not the most recent study. It is not the only study.

What is so insulting about you is your arrogance and your refusal to read or think.

What is so insulting about you is your tendentious tendency to mislead. IPCC 2007 may not have been able to take those papers into account, but Bristol July 2009 took all papers like them into account, due to the methodology that was employed, and which I referenced in post #297. But they could not take Bristol July 2009 into account, as it was published after they were, and Bristol remains the most current climatological statement we have on the subject.