re: #307 Salamantis

BTW: I also upding your good comments. But on this issue you seem to be an extremist sensationalist alarmist AGW-exaggerating doppelganger of the Imhofes of the world.

I, otoh, accept the moderate sensible centrist position that is actually supported by the current climatological consenus.

Ludwig isn’t an extremist, nor sensationalist, nor alarmist. No one actually thinks you aren’t clever, Sal, but on this issue you seem to be mired in some kind of weird battle that you shouldn’t be. It’s tiresome, and disappointing to read, as I like you both.

But then again, I’m just a DFH who wants people to get along. Here’s my dedication to you both:

Youtube Video