re: #329 recusancy

ug see the quoted box he said “100% certainty” that is what I was talking about. To say we know man is the sole cause for CO2 increases in the atmosphere is not true and to to say the model is 100% accurate is also not true.

Man it has taken all this time for science to start to understand the physics behind atomic structures. They are only now really beginning to understand the underlying harmonics in sub-subatomic particles. Once they come to the full realization of this it will only close only one question while posing a large series of exponentially complex questions to be answered.

We are only scratching the surface on being able to understand climate on a small scale let alone trying to understand it on a global scale.