re: #470 Bagua

I am debating a simple point which is valid.

no.you.are.not. You are turning off intelligent thought in favor of a pedantic, pointless argument by authority. You know that the IPCC report is a political document, yet you cling to its “>90%, very likely” language like it justifies the last death rattle of whatever reasonable doubt might have once existed. I don’t blame Ludwig for losing his temper with your idiocy, at all, as you bait him with repeated non-thoughts and obstreperous insistence that the IPCC political compromise represents “the science,” when it quite clearly does not.

He is right, you are a troll.