re: #57 danarchy

It’s weird, it is all based on a preprint study that got passed around. I can’t for the life of me figure out why people accept a single study with shaky findings by a single group, but not what is now one of the most studied vaccines in history, that the scientific community almost universally says is safe and effective.

I think this is what got it started:
nature.com[no phone numbers allowed]0-5

Printed
With footnotes and references
Looks official, like so much other stuff
So it must be true