re: #624 Salamantis

I am not anti AGW. In fact I accept that there is indeed global warming, and that human activity has contributed to it, and that negative consequences are entailed.

What I AM is anti AGW exaggeration. To misreresent the empirical evidence and the climatological consensus derived from it, or the effects that it might reasonably be expected to produce in the future, in either direction, are, to me, equally reprehensible.

Perfectly reasonable. Just understand that the predictions, all of them are rather dire. Here is a great paper that looks at a large number of predictions.
pnas.org