re: #703 Salamantis

re: #704 Salamantis

Your 2009 paper comes to defend IPCC and even gives credence to issues that both it and IPCC did not take into account that would make matters worse.

IPCC was 2007.

In the course of our discussions, I have given you over ten papers from 2007-2009 that detail what those other issues making things worse would be. The ice and the bogs are going faster than IPCC accounted for. This means that the feedbacks are growing faster than IPCC accounted for and your Bristol paper actually acknowledges this.

You refuse to see the papers. You refuse to take into account that IPCC is a lowball estimate because of them. I could give you ten dozen papers and you would still spout nonsense.

So from now on I am going to take a new tact with you. You are not a denier, you are just some web fool who is pompous enough that he just has to be right against the physicist no matter how many papers he brings you. G-d forbid you read them and understand the mechanism.

So from no on, since it is utterly clear that this is not about science for you at all, but rather that I or someone acknowledges your genius is so great that you can master any field just by skimming abstracts, I will lay the hammer down hard.

Sal, you are very bright. You are not a physicist. You don’t know physics and you have not taken the time to learn physics. You are so, pompous, arrogant and insecure, that you can not take the time to read the physics when it is given to again and again and then patiently explained to you.

This is a very childish and insecure behavior on your part. Your value as a person does not change if I know more science than you. I should know more science than you - It is after all my job, and unlike you, I spent yars actually studying it.

I am tired of dealing with your ignorant attempts to show off how bight you are by derailing discussion about important issues that I am trying to inform people about. It makes you a pathetic ass.