re: #77 Killgore Trout

That will be the easy part. Once it can be shown that he was aware of the whole tape and the nature of her statement it won’t be difficult to prove that he edited the tape with the intention of misrepresenting what she was saying.

Isn’t that the real problem, though? Can one distinguish that easily between malice and incompetence or commentary?

Doesn’t this get back to the problem of proving conspiracy (in the legal sense, not the paranoia of Alex Jones)?