re: #173 DaddyG

Otherwise the speculation is no more valid than if I said “There’s a good chance that the dick who stole the emails was part of liberal endorsed Code Pink anti-millitary movement.”

There’s a reasonable chance he’s associated with Code Pink, yes. They’re certainly supporters of his. There is somewhat less reason to believe this than with Oathkeepers, given that there are many, many military people who are Oathkeepers and very few military members who are part of or associated with Code Pink, but he’s obviously an ‘exceptional’ fellow anyway.

I’m somewhat surprised in that he usually does a good job of substanciating he claims.

I’m surprised that you’re so hostile to a speculation that was voiced about a ‘chance’, and that you’re saying it’s wrong to speculate at all without proof. You’re basically saying any speculation is wrong. I don’t get why.