re: #237 rollwave87

I didn’t see it that way. I mean, I didnt check into the persons membership history or anything. So if they are a troll who hoodwinked me into updinging their post, then thats my bad and I take responsibility for it. but, i up’ed that post because i just honest to goodness agree with it. I think ‘sneering’ is a good word for the attitude the majority of people at this blog (that I still have a lot of respect for) are taking towards gov. palin. and I think that poster (or troll, whomever) raised some good questions. I wouldn’t agree with them that this blog has taken an overall poor turn or anything. as i said yesterday, I have been 100% behind charles’ quest to shine some light on the morons (glenn beck, etc.) dominating the republican discourse right now. I just happen to (passionatly, maybe over passionatley) disagree that Sarah should be in that camp. If it means I get 100 negative ratings (including many from charles, whom I have a lot of respect for), so be it. its how i feel.

Fair enough. Why do you feel that Sarah Palin should not be included in the “screwy right” category? What does she bring to the table that can still make her a political winner?