re: #280 Sharmuta

I’m not sure what there is to question of the photographer’s credibility. He’s a nature photographer who admits he was skeptical, but once he looked into the science more, was convinced by the evidence. He came up with the idea to do some time lapse photography, and it speaks for itself. What’s there to question?

Well teh mode of the denier is to question anything that they don’t like - even things as plain as time lapse photographs. It’s like the Magritte panting of a pipe that says this is not a pipe.