re: #40 KGxvi

The problem with that earlier hearing was that there was no real context for it, and it was basically a stunt. I think with the context of the hearings with fact witnesses in the books, having someone explain the historical/constitutional issues that isn’t a member of congress could actually help.

Again, I feel such would be best held off until the Senate trial, where the immediacy of events would bring greater focus on the arguments those experts could bring to the proceedings. If nothing else, we’d avoid Repubs bitching on live TV that the House Dems have time to bring in experts to offer opinions, but no time to holding a minority hearing with the witnesses they want to hear from.