re: #129 Dangerman

Someone had to tell, explain, warn the POTUS that it was wrong to take stuff that didn’t belong to him.

Now they’re gonna argue whether he sufficiently “understood” this kindergarten level concept.

And he’s running for the office again.

At this point, whether he understood or not is not the question. As far as the law is concerned, the questions are:

1) Was he adequately warned what he was doing was a crime, and
2) Did he do it anyway.

The answer to both of those, it appears, is yes. That’s not good for him, so unless they are going to plead that he is mentally unfit to stand trial, I see that case ending one of two ways: Guilty, or Loose Cannon gets him off on a technicality (but I am not yet convinced that she is in the tank for him specifically, merely spectacularly incompetent).