2 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:45:50am |
There is no way one of the speakers fails to place an empty chair on stage at the Dem convention.
4 | wrenchwench Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:46:33am |
My religious beliefs? Sure. I come from the Church of Great Moral Timber.— POTUS Chair (@POTUSChair) August 31, 2012
5 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:47:04am |
re: #2 Decatur Deb
There is no way one of the speakers fails to place an empty chair on stage at the Dem convention.
It would be perfection if it was the POTUS himself, but that won't happen. It will be someone else instead.
8 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:47:51am |
re: #5 Lidane
It would be perfection if it was the POTUS himself, but that won't happen. It will be someone else instead.
Yup. just sit it there and ignore it.
9 | CriticalDragon1177 Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:48:10am |
Charles Johnson
Its not like the Republican Party doesn't have a platform, even if its a really bad one. So I really don't get it.
10 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:48:19am |
After an entire week of Republican speeches and talking points, everyone is talking about an empty chair.
That is either completely pathetic or deviously brilliant.
11 | Kronocide Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:48:24am |
re: #3 The Left
Heh. this isn't going to get old anytime soon.
This is epic LULZWIN. We're just gettin this beyatch warmed up.
12 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:48:37am |
Might explain why McCain wanted to attack the Ottoman Empire...
13 | Bulworth Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:49:04am |
re: #9 CriticalDragon1177
Charles Johnson
Its not like the Republican Party doesn't have a platform, even if its a really bad one. So I really don't get it.
Someone at the Dem convention, in prime time, should just read from the GOPteabag platform.
14 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:49:47am |
re: #13 Bulworth
Someone at the Dem convention, in prime time, should just read from the GOPteabag platform.
Now, that would result in the American people actually hearing what they support and stand for. Better just to make empty promises of tax cuts and rainbows.
15 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:50:05am |
re: #10 Kragar
After an entire week of Republican speeches and talking points, everyone is talking about an empty chair.
That is either completely pathetic or deviously brilliant.
More to the point, an entire week of Republican speeches and talking points designed to try and convince people that the GOP wasn't a bunch of angry white guys yelling at an imaginary version of Barack Obama.
Oops.
16 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:50:27am |
Just thought I'd share a picture of my Cabinet. twitter.com/InvisibleObama...— Invisible Obama (@InvisibleObama) August 31, 2012
17 | wrenchwench Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:50:34am |
I JUST CHECKED IN ON ABUELO CLINT EASTWOOD, he is in his hotel room TALKING TO THE SOFA— Mexican Mitt Parody (@MexicanMitt) August 31, 2012
19 | Kronocide Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:50:46am |
Charles,
I would rename it "The New Platform of the Republican Party: A mid century traditional wooden chair. With an imaginary boogeyman in it."
20 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:51:52am |
21 | Feline Emperor of the Conservative Waste Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:52:06am |
re: #18 dragonfire1981
Shouldn't the chair be white?
White birch. Afraid of global warming, wrapped in paper and used to make popsicle sticks.
23 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:53:24am |
24 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:54:38am |
Republican chair is awol--last seen at Chippendale's
25 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:55:53am |
"Mr. Romney himself asked Mr. Eastwood to come to the convention" is.gd/2Ugl2x— Rachel Maddow MSNBC (@maddow) August 31, 2012
27 | wrenchwench Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:56:37am |
re: #24 Decatur Deb
Republican chair is awol--last seen at Chippendale's
The platform has been tabled until its return.
28 | Coracle Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:56:43am |
Here's the thing. Romney can't win on his own record or his own ideas. He has to win on tearing Obama. Much of the firepower of the RNC was devoted to showing how Obama = Fail rather than Romney = Success.
The fact we-the-country are talking mostly about unoccupied furniture and old movie stars means that the primary message of the RNC was largely ineffectual outside the core believers.
29 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:57:03am |
re: #25 Lidane
[Embedded content]
That doesn't surprise me. Part of me thinks he found out that Clint was supporting him, wanted a chance to meet him, and thought it would be a swell idea to let the old man address the crowd which could have worked if they had actually looked at what Clint planned to say.
30 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:57:13am |
Meanwhile, Trump is talking to his hair, "THAT COULD HAVE BEEN ME!"
31 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:58:03am |
re: #5 Lidane
It would be perfection if it was the POTUS himself, but that won't happen. It will be someone else instead.
I don't know about that. If Obama can do a mike drop on Jimmy Fallon's show, he's capable of a chair bit.
32 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:58:13am |
re: #30 Kragar
Meanwhile, Trump is talking to his hair, "THAT COULD HAVE BEEN ME!"
Ha- Yeah I bet Trump's thinking, "Really I would have been just as surreal as Clint, why didn't they let me do this?"
33 | jaunte Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:58:53am |
re: #24 Decatur Deb
Republican chair is awol--last seen at Chippendale's
Looks unstable to me
Image: rightwingchair.jpg
34 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:58:57am |
re: #27 wrenchwench
The platform has been tabled until its return.
Could you couch that in better language?
35 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:59:38am |
To be fair, the empty chair thing isn't exactly original. The Romney Campaign has been doing it for months.
36 | wrenchwench Fri, Aug 31, 2012 10:59:50am |
When Clint said, "Let me talk to the chair," they thought he wanted to speak to Reince Priebus.
37 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:00:18am |
re: #36 wrenchwench
When Clint said, "Let me talk to the chair," they thought he wanted to speak to Reince Priebus.
Best.
38 | wrenchwench Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:01:03am |
40 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:01:40am |
It was stirring when Dolan said to "Put on the armoire of the Lord".
41 | abolitionist Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:01:58am |
The chair is a distraction from the TPGOP platform and candidates.
42 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:02:03am |
re: #39 Destro
Invisible Obama is still more real than a visible Romney.
If you look closely, Invisible Obama is in every picture of the RNC
43 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:02:24am |
re: #36 wrenchwench
When Clint said, "Let me talk to the chair," they thought he wanted to speak to Reince Priebus.
That is a note perfect Tweet.
44 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:02:30am |
re: #40 Decatur Deb
It was stirring when Dolan said to "Put on the armoire of the Lord".
Ah that's another thing. They were planning to use this convention to try to reach out to Catholics. I really don't think they succeeded in doing that.
45 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:03:05am |
So, when they were thanking the chairman(Preibus) they were acutally thanking Obama?
46 | wrenchwench Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:03:37am |
re: #43 Mattand
That is a note perfect Tweet.
Don't mind if I do...
When Clint said, "Let me talk to the chair," they thought he wanted to speak to Reince Priebus.— 2spokie2 (@2spokie2) August 31, 2012
47 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:03:56am |
re: #42 Kragar
If you look closely, Invisible Obama is in every picture of the RNC
The greatest trick @invisibleobama ever pulled was being in every picture hashtagged #eastwooding.— Invisible Obama (@InvisibleObama) August 31, 2012
48 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:04:18am |
re: #44 HappyWarrior
Ah that's another thing. They were planning to use this convention to try to reach out to Catholics. I really don't think they succeeded in doing that.
Because their message is pew.
49 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:04:25am |
re: #32 HappyWarrior
Ha- Yeah I bet Trump's thinking, "Really I would have been just as surreal as Clint, why didn't they let me do this?"
What's really sad is that if the rumors were true, Trump's hackneyed "you're fired" bit would have been a step up from what Eastwood did.
50 | CriticalDragon1177 Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:04:26am |
re: #13 Bulworth
Someone at the Dem convention, in prime time, should just read from the GOPteabag platform.
That might be kind of fun, actually.
51 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:05:03am |
52 | wrenchwench Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:05:36am |
53 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:06:01am |
54 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:06:04am |
Oh good lord, I'm dying here
'Honey Boo Boo' Ratings Top the Republican National Convention
Here Comes Honey Boo Boo, TLC's controversial reality show about a self-proclaimed "redneck" family and their Toddlers and Tiaras daughter, hit another ratings high Wednesday night.
The fourth episode of Honey Boo Boo pulled in just shy of 3 million viewers at 10 p.m., according to Nielsen overnight ratings, growing 30 percent from last week's 2.3 million haul.
In the demo, Honey Boo Boo did even better. The half-hour series' showing among adults 18-49 bested all other cable outings for the night -- including coverage of the Republican National Convention -- to pull a 1.3 rating.
55 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:06:21am |
57 | Destro Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:07:20am |
I am trying to figure out if the new symbol of the GOP is the wall or an empty chair?
58 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:07:48am |
59 | Tigger2 Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:07:51am |
re: #16 Lidane
[Embedded content]
Invisible Obama is awesome if I tweeted I would have to follow it.
60 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:08:35am |
re: #49 Mattand
What's really sad is that if the rumors were true, Trump's hackneyed "you're fired" bit would have been a step up from what Eastwood did.
I know right? I heard about that on Monday or whatever right before they canceled it and thought it was probably the lamest thing they could do to get a rise from the audience. Hell, when I heard it would be Clint, I thought it could be interesting because Clint's actually been an elected official before and has been acting long before I was born so he knows how to deal with audience. "That" though was probably the most weird thing I've ever seen in politics and bear in mind I live in the state that had "Macaca". I feel bad for Eastwood more than disgust because he made himself into a joke. Still don't get why a man with his views is supporting Mitt. Free country after all though.
61 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:08:49am |
62 | Big Steve Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:08:58am |
Know I am in a minority here but I liked Clint's speech. He just simply does not think the President has done an acceptable job. He is not a racist, he is a social moderate....he just has a political opinion. His empty chair reference was no more annoying than Garry Trudeaux childishly constantly drawing President Bush as a feather.
64 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:09:16am |
65 | wrenchwench Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:09:28am |
66 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:09:45am |
re: #61 Decatur Deb
Had to select a nic in haste. Got some very gallant welcomes in minutes.
Were any of them independently wealthy?
67 | Decatur Deb Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:10:34am |
68 | Destro Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:10:49am |
re: #54 Kragar
Oh good lord, I'm dying here
'Honey Boo Boo' Ratings Top the Republican National Convention
To be fair the GOP could not tell the difference between the two programs. They kind of look alike.
69 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:10:51am |
re: #65 wrenchwench
You know about Stanley Sea, right?
No, and since I just extracted my foot from mouth, I should probably check.
Charles Johnson's a dude, right?
71 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:12:29am |
re: #62 Big Steve
His empty chair reference was no more annoying than Garry Trudeaux childishly constantly drawing President Bush as a feather.
Quayle was the feather because he was considered a lightweight. Clinton was drawn as a waffle. Both Bush presidents were blips (i..e, points of light) but Dubya wore a lot of hats.
HOWEVER, that sort of thing goes over in print, and Trudeau has a long history of using it as a plot device. Talking to an empty chair doesn't work when you do it live.
72 | Digital Display Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:12:42am |
re: #66 Mattand
Were any of them independently wealthy?
I was leaning against the wall looking cool hitting on Deb the first day..
It wasn't pretty! *wink*
Hiya Lizards!
73 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:13:18am |
re: #68 Destro
To be fair the GOP could not tell the difference between the two programs. They kind of look alike.
Honey Boo Boo was the more intellectually robust and honest program.
74 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:13:24am |
This should be fun:
Just a reminder we're on TONIGHT at 11/10c. And this happened. twitter.com/TheDailyShow/s...— The Daily Show (@TheDailyShow) August 31, 2012
75 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:13:38am |
re: #62 Big Steve
Know I am in a minority here but I liked Clint's speech. He just simply does not think the President has done an acceptable job. He is not a racist, he is a social moderate....he just has a political opinion. His empty chair reference was no more annoying than Garry Trudeaux childishly constantly drawing President Bush as a feather.
I don't think anyone has a problem with Clint being disappointed with Obama. The problem is he delivered a rambling tirade to a piece of furniture, as if he had just chugged a gallon of cough syrup.
76 | erik_t Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:14:46am |
re: #75 Mattand
I don't think anyone has a problem with Clint being disappointed with Obama. The problem is he delivered a rambling tirade to a piece of furniture, as if he had just chugged a gallon of cough syrup.
I've had uncles and grandfathers deliver very similar, uh.... oratories, but I would never ask them to stand in as the face of a national party.
It's not even funny. It's sad. It was legitimately uncomfortable to watch.
77 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:15:28am |
@thedailyshow Save a seat for me.— Invisible Obama (@InvisibleObama) August 31, 2012
78 | erik_t Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:16:21am |
re: #74 Lidane
I like how even Invisible Obama has a teleprompter.
79 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:17:04am |
re: #75 Mattand
I don't think anyone has a problem with Clint being disappointed with Obama. The problem is he delivered a rambling tirade to a piece of furniture, as if he had just chugged a gallon of cough syrup.
Nor is anyone here calling him a racist for it either. Really, when I heard about Clint Eastwood's statement on gay marriage not that long ago, I was really awestruck because here's a man from my grandfather's generation sounding very reasonable on this issue. The other thing though is that Eastwood was blasting Obama for continuing in Afghanistan when his candidate of choice has criticized the administration for not doing more there and he got the unemployment numbers wrong too. Clint's still one of my favorites and I really hope that this isn't remembered as well as the Man With No Name trilogy because those are some awesome westerns and this is coming from someone who doesn't like westerns much.
80 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:17:13am |
Senate Candidate Assumes Women Must Be ‘Talking About Shoes’
on the campaign trail, Smith suggested that the only thing two women might have to talk about is shoe shopping. Approaching two women at a campaign stop, Smith called them “girls,” then added:
SMITH: What are we talking about here, two girls together talking?WOMAN: We’re talking about the power of petite women.
SMITH: My guess would’ve been you were talking about shoes.
81 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:17:30am |
re: #76 erik_t
I've had uncles and grandfathers deliver very similar, uh.... oratories, but I would never ask them to stand in as the face of a national party.
It's not even funny. It's sad. It was legitimately uncomfortable to watch.
I'm a bit of a hypocrite, as in I've made a few cracks about it today on Twitter. But yeah, that's what the issue is.
I also am wondering if there was a lot of hands-off with this incident. According to the NYT, Romney personally invited Eastwood to speak. I get the feeling that they are two guys who haven't heard the word "No" in a long time.
82 | Big Steve Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:17:39am |
re: #71 Lidane
Quayle was the feather because he was considered a lightweight. Clinton was drawn as a waffle. Both Bush presidents were blips (i..e, points of light) but Dubya wore a lot of hats.
So what is his icon for President Obama? (honestly asking, haven't read Doonesbury in years)
84 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:17:54am |
re: #78 erik_t
I like how even Invisible Obama has a teleprompter.
I like how every member of the Romney campaign was wishing Clint had used one.
85 | Hercules Grytpype-Thynne Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:18:25am |
re: #69 Mattand
No, and since I just extracted my foot from mouth, I should probably check.
Charles Johnson's a dude, right?
Yup. The ponytail's a dead giveaway.
87 | engineer cat Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:19:51am |
Ryan Chides Empty Chair For Failing To Prevent Custer Massacre
also hints responsibility in cane chair mutiny
88 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:20:12am |
You know how it acme across actually when I think about it? It was like my late grandfather. Great guy and like Clint, a Korean War vet going off on one of his tangents. Now, me, my brothers, and my mom found them endearing because that's our grandpa up there but we would be embarrassed if he went up in front of the whole country and did that. Clint's not a bad guy but the whole thing just came out as the internet memes have shown as if Abe Simpson came to life and gave a speech.
89 | wrenchwench Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:21:29am |
re: #88 HappyWarrior
You know how it acme across actually when I think about it? It was like my late grandfather. Great guy and like Clint, a Korean War vet going off on one of his tangents. Now, me, my brothers, and my mom found them endearing because that's our grandpa up there but we would be embarrassed if he went up in front of the whole country and did that. Clint's not a bad guy but the whole thing just came out as the internet memes have shown as if Abe Simpson came to life and gave a speech.
Did I or did I not call this?!?!RT @suzisteffen: Matt Groening called it. #eastwooding #todaysheadline twitter.com/SuziSteffen/st..." #p2— April(@ReignOfApril) August 31, 2012
90 | PhillyPretzel Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:21:29am |
According to yahoo last night's talk to the empty chair has a name Eastwooding
91 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:21:33am |
re: #79 HappyWarrior
Nor is anyone calling him a racist for it either. Really, when I heard about Clint Eastwood's statement on gay marriage not that long ago, I was really awestruck because here's a man from my grandfather's generation sounding very reasonable on this issue. The other thing though is that Eastwood was blasting Obama for continuing in Afghanistan when his candidate of choice has criticized the administration for not doing more there and he got the unemployment numbers wrong too. Clint's still one of my favorites and I really hope that this isn't remembered as well as the Man With No Name trilogy because those are some awesome westerns and this is coming from someone who doesn't like westerns much.
Unforgiven is one of my favorite movies of all time, partly because of a scene near the end of the film. Clint is threatening the town after they've killed Morgan Freeman's character. In the background, ever so fuzzed out, is an American flag flapping in the night breeze.
I've always interpreted that as a nod that America, while a great country, can be as flawed as most of the characters in the film. Could just be me, though.
92 | Digital Display Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:21:52am |
re: #75 Mattand
I don't think anyone has a problem with Clint being disappointed with Obama. The problem is he delivered a rambling tirade to a piece of furniture, as if he had just chugged a gallon of cough syrup.
Back in 2008/2009 I posted a movie review every Saturday Morning.
I sure caught Hell with my Clint reviews. It was like touching the 3rd rail of American acting.
He is the same guy in every movie. No depth of Character IMO. Doesn't matter if it was Million dollar baby or in Grand Torino or Unforgiven.. Same guy, Same Character
93 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:22:46am |
re: #92 Digital Display
Back in 2008/2009 I posted a movie review every Saturday Morning.
I sure caught Hell with my Clint reviews. It was like touching the 3rd rail of American acting.
He is the same guy in every movie. No depth of Character IMO. Doesn't matter if it was Million dollar baby or in Grand Torino or Unforgiven.. Same guy, Same Character
Yeah, I can see that. Tom Cruise falls in that category as well.
94 | Hercules Grytpype-Thynne Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:23:32am |
re: #93 Mattand
Yeah, I can see that. Tom Cruise falls in that category as well.
The classic example is John Wayne.
95 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:23:43am |
re: #82 Big Steve
So what is his icon for President Obama? (honestly asking, haven't read Doonesbury in years)
I don't know. From what I understand, Trudeau has never been able to choose an icon for Obama.
96 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:24:13am |
re: #92 Digital Display
Back in 2008/2009 I posted a movie review every Saturday Morning.
I sure caught Hell with my Clint reviews. It was like touching the 3rd rail of American acting.
He is the same guy in every movie. No depth of Character IMO. Doesn't matter if it was Million dollar baby or in Grand Torino or Unforgiven.. Same guy, Same Character
I think he's a better director than actor. Thought Flags of our Fathers was one of the more underrated WWII flicks. Maybe not an all time great but I thought it deserved more accolades than it got.
97 | Bulworth Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:24:32am |
The thing with the 'disappointment' meme being promoted by the GOPteabag is that the issues with which the opposition party would be disappointed would just change based on whatever Obama had failed to do. If OBL were still alive, for example, they would claim they were 'disappointed' that Obama was allowing OBL to remain free and wasn't prosecuting the war on terror sufficiently, etc.
On the other hand, I have a hard time believing the GOPteabag party is upset about unemployment. All they've done in Congress is pass anti-abortion bill, and multiple votes to repeal the ACA. And remember they don't want the Fed doing anything about unemployment either.
So I call Bullshit on the 'disappointment' meme.
98 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:24:36am |
Important Omissions From Romney’s Convention Speech
0 mentions of Financial Reform
0 mentions of Climate Change
0 mentions of Immigration
0 mentions of Romneycare
0 mentions of Afghanistan or Syria
0 mentions of Social Security
0 mentions of Veterans
99 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:24:40am |
re: #90 PhillyPretzel
According to yahoo last night's talk to the empty chair has a name Eastwooding
100 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:25:31am |
re: #94 Hercules Grytpype-Thynne
The classic example is John Wayne.
Yep. Like him in the Searchers and The Quiet Man but Wayne's acting really doesn't do anything for me. I really like the method actors that trained with Strasberg. Huge DeNiro fan here and Al Pacino too.
101 | Bulworth Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:25:34am |
re: #98 Kragar
Important Omissions From Romney’s Convention Speech
0 mentions of Financial Reform
0 mentions of Climate Change
0 mentions of Immigration
0 mentions of Romneycare
0 mentions of Afghanistan or Syria
0 mentions of Social Security
0 mentions of Veterans
Iraq? War on Terror?
102 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:25:51am |
My parents spent a week at the RNC and all they got me was this stupid meme...
103 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:26:57am |
re: #101 Bulworth
Iraq? War on Terror?
No mention of Iraq and from what a link I saw earlier, Billy Kristol was none too pleased with that.
104 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:28:05am |
re: #100 HappyWarrior
Yep. Like him in the Searchers and The Quiet Man but Wayne's acting really doesn't do anything for me. I really like the method actors that trained with Strasberg. Huge DeNiro fan here and Al Pacino too.
Johnny Depp is someone who I admire as an actor. You could make the criticism that all of the characters are "off" to a degree, but still different in a lot of respects. Still say his best role was Ed Wood, with Donnie Brasco a close second.
105 | AK-47% Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:28:13am |
re: #62 Big Steve
Know I am in a minority here but I liked Clint's speech. He just simply does not think the President has done an acceptable job. He is not a racist, he is a social moderate....he just has a political opinion. His empty chair reference was no more annoying than Garry Trudeaux childishly constantly drawing President Bush as a feather.
I can even accept parts of that, I just did not see them making the point that Mitt could or would do a better job...
106 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:28:42am |
re: #103 HappyWarrior
No mention of Iraq and from what a link I saw earlier, Billy Kristol was none too pleased with that.
Kristol Blasts Romney For Ignoring Afghanistan, U.S. Troops In Convention Speech
The United States has some 68,000 troops fighting in Afghanistan. Over two thousand Americans have died in the more than ten years of that war, a war Mitt Romney has supported. Yet in his speech accepting his party’s nomination to be commander in chief, Mitt Romney said not a word about the war in Afghanistan. Nor did he utter a word of appreciation to the troops fighting there, or to those who have fought there. Nor for that matter were there thanks for those who fought in Iraq, another conflict that went unmentioned.
Leave aside the question of the political wisdom of Romney’s silence, and the opportunities it opens up for President Obama next week. What about the civic propriety of a presidential nominee failing even to mention, in his acceptance speech, a war we’re fighting and our young men and women who are fighting it? Has it ever happened that we’ve been at war and a presidential nominee has ignored, in this kind of major and formal speech, the war and our warriors?
107 | Interesting Times Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:29:22am |
Oh ad algorithms, why must you be so cruel? ;)
Irony? Coincidence? When I downloaded the NYTimes Eastwood convention story, the ad on the page was about dementia. twitter.com/PeterGleick/st...— Peter Gleick (@PeterGleick) August 31, 2012
108 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:30:21am |
re: #104 Mattand
Johnny Depp is someone who I admire as an actor. You could make the criticism that all of the characters are "off" to a degree, but still different in a lot of respects. Still say his best role was Ed Wood, with Donnie Brasco a close second.
Donnie Brasco was a great role because it's one of those rare acting roles where a guy is portraying two people basically. Because remember he's "Donnie Brasco" aka FBI Agent Joe Pistone. I think that one movie has one of Al's more underrated ones. I felt downright sorry for his Lefty character. One of my favorite acting roles of all time though has to be DeNiro as the young Vito Corleone.
109 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:31:55am |
re: #106 Kragar
Kristol Blasts Romney For Ignoring Afghanistan, U.S. Troops In Convention Speech
I can't stand Kristol because of his overly hawkish bs but he has a point there."What about the civic propriety of a presidential nominee failing even to mention, in his acceptance speech, a war we’re fighting and our young men and women who are fighting it? Has it ever happened that we’ve been at war and a presidential nominee has ignored, in this kind of major and formal speech, the war and our warriors?"
110 | R.M, Ramallo Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:32:13am |
I liked "In the Line of Fire" with Clint and Malkovich.
Anyway, I didn't detect any racism, I just felt uncomfortable seeing Clint Eastwood as an old man.
I mean, Clint Eastwood is the character you look for when you watch his movies. After all, I don't want to see Charles Bronson in a romantic comedy.
111 | Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:34:12am |
112 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:34:23am |
re: #110 OhNoZombies!
I liked "In the Line of Fire" with Clint and Malkovich.
Anyway, I didn't detect any racism, I just felt uncomfortable seeing Clint Eastwood as an old man.
I mean, Clint Eastwood is the character you look for when you watch his movies. After all, I don't want to see Charles Bronson in a romantic comedy.
Charles Bronson and Katherine Heigl in Old Love. Just razzing Bronson, haven't seen him in too much but he was from the same part of Pennsylvania as my mom's parents and had a similar ethnic background and his father was a miner too, and Danny the Tunnel King is after McQueen's Hilts my favorite character in the Great Escape.
113 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:34:29am |
re: #110 OhNoZombies!
I liked "In the Line of Fire" with Clint and Malkovich.
Anyway, I didn't detect any racism, I just felt uncomfortable seeing Clint Eastwood as an old man.
I mean, Clint Eastwood is the character you look for when you watch his movies. After all, I don't want to see Charles Bronson in a romantic comedy.
114 | dragonath Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:34:35am |
115 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:34:50am |
#priceless; MT @paulackerman: @ericboehlert RW Math:Romney "Catches" Obama (but is behind by 3) rasmussenreports.com/public_content...— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) August 31, 2012
117 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:37:35am |
Whoever created this feed is hilarious. I want to know who's running it:
Watch LIVE as my 50,000+ Twitter followers and I hold a rally at Met Life Stadium. twitter.com/InvisibleObama...— Invisible Obama (@InvisibleObama) August 31, 2012
118 | blueraven Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:38:56am |
re: #62 Big Steve
Know I am in a minority here but I liked Clint's speech. He just simply does not think the President has done an acceptable job. He is not a racist, he is a social moderate....he just has a political opinion. His empty chair reference was no more annoying than Garry Trudeaux childishly constantly drawing President Bush as a feather.
He did that at the DNC?
His speech was bizarre and goes to the incompetency of the RNC that would allow an non-vetted speaker on the biggest night of the entire Romney campaign.
119 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:39:20am |
Charles Bronson in Lola
"A middle aged writer of pornographic novels meets and falls in love with a sixteen year old school girl. This alone is cause for concern but when the couple get married and move to America, the trouble (and fun) really begins."
120 | Eventual Carrion Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:39:32am |
121 | lawhawk Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:39:47am |
The empty chair in the room - why everyone ignores Romneycare and his term of office as governor of Massachussetts. Everyone would have to have collective amnesia to ignore that Romney's health care reform plan formed the basis for the PPACA.
Everyone would have to ignore that the GOP proposed the individual mandate nearly 20 years ago and it was a central plank to personal accountability and responsibility as to get more Americans insured. Now? They're running against themselves because they've decided that because the guy across the aisle got their proposals enacted, it must be overturned on rather dubious grounds considering that most courts have previously held that Congress has the power to tax, and that health care is interstate commerce (to say nothing of promoting the general welfare).
122 | engineer cat Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:39:59am |
re: #98 Kragar
Important Omissions From Romney’s Convention Speech
0 mentions of Financial Reform
0 mentions of Climate Change
0 mentions of Immigration
0 mentions of Romneycare
0 mentions of Afghanistan or Syria
0 mentions of Social Security
0 mentions of Veterans
on the other hand, they demonstrated that dumping on obama would be a top priority for a romney administration
123 | lawhawk Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:40:51am |
re: #117 Lidane
Heh. You can tell the Jets fans among that crowd by: (1) the ones who have the bags over their heads; (2) the ones who are Tebowing and they know it. /
124 | Jadewater Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:41:25am |
125 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:41:38am |
re: #122 engineer cat
on the other hand, they demonstrated that dumping on obama would be a top priority for a romney administration
Funny that given that they whine when someone even mentions a failed Bush policy even though they too blame Bush when it suits their goals. And Mitt is still whining about Jimmy Carter, a man who left office before my parents even married.
126 | sagehen Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:42:10am |
re: #2 Decatur Deb
There is no way one of the speakers fails to place an empty chair on stage at the Dem convention.
Each of them Deb. All of them except POTUS.
A dining table chair. An adirondak, a Shaker, a Laz-E-Boy, an ergonomic desk chair. A barstool.
127 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:42:12am |
I'm sure this will go over well with the Romney campaign, especially since Bernanke is a Republican:
Bernanke: Spending cuts harming the economy, may lead to further Fed stimulus tpm.ly/QKcNE5— Talking Points Memo (@TPM) August 31, 2012
128 | engineer cat Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:42:50am |
re: #118 blueraven
He did that at the DNC?
His speech was bizarre and goes to the incompetency of the RNC that would allow an non-vetted speaker on the biggest night of the entire Romney campaign.
not to mention that it begs all of us non-republicans to put words into the mouth of empty chairs representing romney and ryan
"what's that you say, empty chair ryan? it's not fair for people to check up on your claims? they should just believe everything you say because you have such pretty blue eyes?"
129 | Jadewater Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:43:39am |
re: #117 Lidane
Whoever created this feed is hilarious. I want to know who's running it:
[Embedded content]
Me too.
130 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:43:42am |
re: #127 Lidane
I'm sure this will go over well with the Romney campaign, especially since Bernanke is a Republican:
[Embedded content]
Bernanke is part of that administration whose name can't be mentioned except when we're accusing Democrats of blaming it for legitimate reasons. So ergo he doesn't count but yes I trust Bernanke's judgment far more than I do Mitt's when it comes to economics. Mitt can take his precious private sector experience and shove it.
131 | Jadewater Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:45:15am |
I hope this invisible obama person keeps tweeting through to the election. It would be an amusing way to follow whats going on.
132 | R.M, Ramallo Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:45:43am |
BBL.
I have to meet the kids at the bus stop, drop them off at grandma's, and begin to drink mass quantities of...anything, to get the image of romantic Bronson or Bronson and a 16 year old girl out of my mind.
Gross.
133 | sagehen Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:46:14am |
134 | Bulworth Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:49:36am |
So Obama's invisible but he's a soshulist trying to destroy America and a Chicago thug giving more welfare and food stamps to blah people and oh how disappointed we are with high unemployment and the war in Afghanistan which Obama being an Islamicist appeasing wussy is trying to shorten before Victory by setting deadlines for our troops to come home.
Yeah, makes sense.
/
135 | lawhawk Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:52:50am |
Ann Romney for one wasn't particularly enthused by Clint's performance. And staffers weren't exactly thrilled either.
The Romney campaign tried to spin Dirty Harry's rambling monologue/foray into vaudeville as an unexpected delight, "Judging an American icon like Clint Eastwood through a typical political lens doesn't work. His ad libbing was a break from all the political speeches, and the crowd enjoyed it." However, Ann Romney was not very enthusiastic, telling CBS Early Morning , "He's a unique guy and he did a unique thing last night." And when she was asked if she was surprised, "I didn't know it was coming," and then changed the subject, "Again, I can tell you we're grateful for everyone's support and especially grateful for what a great night it was last night."
Unique is probably the best and most charitable way of seeing that performance.
And it will likely not be repeated - except to mock it in about a week's time - at the DNC.
136 | Renaissance_Man Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:52:55am |
re: #134 Bulworth
Those observations that the speech sums up the entire GOP are very, very astute.
In other words, a guy who doesn't really support GOP positions speaking on behalf of the GOP and angrily ranting at an imaginary Obama who doesn't exist.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is the essence of Modern American Conservatism.
137 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:52:56am |
re: #134 Bulworth
So Obama's invisible but he's a soshulist trying to destroy America and a Chicago thug giving more welfare and food stamps to blah people and oh how disappointed we are with high unemployment and the war in Afghanistan which Obama being an Islamicist appeasing wussy is trying to shorten before Victory by setting deadlines for our troops to come home.
Yeah, makes sense.
/
To be fair to Eastwood, I don't think he believes that but the RNC audience that was eating up his every word sure does. Here's another problem with Eastwood's speech though. He basically doubled what the unemployment numbers were. Not trying to say unemployment is good right now but 12 million is different than 25 and they should have looked at his prepared remarks if they had that number in mind and should have just advised him to say something more subtle like unemployment remains high. Another weird part was Eastwood saying something to the effect of we don't need a lawyer as president. Well, Clint, all due respect but the man you're supporting for president is a lawyer too and so have 25 of the men who have been president including some of our greatest ones. I mean a cheap jab at lawyers is always good for a laugh I guess but this one really reeked of Mitt claiming that Obama spent too much time at Harvard.
138 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:53:12am |
Factcheck:Muslim Prayer Service at the DNC?
140 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:56:29am |
re: #136 Renaissance_Man
Those observations that the speech sums up the entire GOP are very, very astute.
In other words, a guy who doesn't really support GOP positions speaking on behalf of the GOP and angrily ranting at an imaginary Obama who doesn't exist.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is the essence of Modern American Conservatism.
Sadly, yes. I mean Clint doesn't have to support Obama's re-election. If he feels he hasn't done a good job but why say you don't give a shit about gays being able to marry when you're giving a speech on national television in support of a man who supports banning it everywhere (not just states having the choice) or that you don't like what happened in Afghanistan all the while Mitt talks a tough game on Iran and has in the past criticized the strength and muscle of the president's Afghanistan policy. Clint's entitled to his opinions and to support whoever he wants but I don't get why he's supporting Mitt. He really seems like Gary Johnson would be more his type.
141 | Renaissance_Man Fri, Aug 31, 2012 11:58:49am |
re: #139 Gus
PSA. Just in case. Dementia is not a laughing matter.
The thing is, I doubt Eastwood is demented. The vast majority of people like that, ie. who are angry at Obama and support the GOP despite not actually agreeing with any of the GOP positions, aren't demented. They just believe one or two of the Conservative cult lies.
Even if you don't watch a lot of FOX, even if you don't listen to Limbaugh, the Conservative cult media is incredibly pervasive. You'll know someone who knows someone who does. You'll hear something repeated in the regular media uncritically. Only a lunatic believes all the conspiracy theories and all the deranged Obama hatred that exists in the media bubble of the right. But lots of Americans believe one or two of them.
And that is what will win the GOP the election - enough lies repeated endlessly so that one or two stick in the national consciousness.
142 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:02:30pm |
re: #141 Renaissance_Man
The thing is, I doubt Eastwood is demented. The vast majority of people like that, ie. who are angry at Obama and support the GOP despite not actually agreeing with any of the GOP positions, aren't demented. They just believe one or two of the Conservative cult lies.
Even if you don't watch a lot of FOX, even if you don't listen to Limbaugh, the Conservative cult media is incredibly pervasive. You'll know someone who knows someone who does. You'll hear something repeated in the regular media uncritically. Only a lunatic believes all the conspiracy theories and all the deranged Obama hatred that exists in the media bubble of the right. But lots of Americans believe one or two of them.
And that is what will win the GOP the election - enough lies repeated endlessly so that one or two stick in the national consciousness.
I'll go a step further and propose that he might not be misinformed or stupid either. I know it seems hard for a lot of people to imagine that some smart well informed people just have different ideas.
143 | Gus Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:03:40pm |
re: #141 Renaissance_Man
The thing is, I doubt Eastwood is demented. The vast majority of people like that, ie. who are angry at Obama and support the GOP despite not actually agreeing with any of the GOP positions, aren't demented. They just believe one or two of the Conservative cult lies.
Even if you don't watch a lot of FOX, even if you don't listen to Limbaugh, the Conservative cult media is incredibly pervasive. You'll know someone who knows someone who does. You'll hear something repeated in the regular media uncritically. Only a lunatic believes all the conspiracy theories and all the deranged Obama hatred that exists in the media bubble of the right. But lots of Americans believe one or two of them.
And that is what will win the GOP the election - enough lies repeated endlessly so that one or two stick in the national consciousness.
Perhaps. But I'm seeing a lot of idiots on Twitter joking about dementia and Clint Eastwood.
144 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:04:03pm |
Romney Campaign Embraces Eastwood’s Speech: ‘Classic,’ ‘Descriptive,’ ‘Spoke From The Heart’
Yeah right, like they had any other choice. What were they going to do? Come out and say "What the fuck was that shit, Clint?"
145 | Bulworth Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:04:08pm |
re: #142 Killgore Trout
I'll go a step further and propose that he might not be misinformed or stupid either. I know it seems hard for a lot of people to imagine that some smart well informed people just have different ideas.
So saying the number of unemployed people is double what it actually is isn't misinformed?
146 | Renaissance_Man Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:04:52pm |
re: #145 Bulworth
So saying the number of unemployed people is double what it actually is isn't misinformed?
It's just a different idea.
Also, OWS.
147 | blueraven Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:06:43pm |
re: #142 Killgore Trout
I'll go a step further and propose that he might not be misinformed or stupid either. I know it seems hard for a lot of people to imagine that some smart well informed people just have different ideas.
Good Lord KT. It is not hard for people to think someone would support Romney, but to suggest that the whole Eastwood episode is not extremely bizarre is just being obtuse.
148 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:08:30pm |
re: #142 Killgore Trout
I'll go a step further and propose that he might not be misinformed or stupid either. I know it seems hard for a lot of people to imagine that some smart well informed people just have different ideas.
The problem is that most people do think of Eastwood as a smart, well-informed guy. That's not the guy who showed up on stage last night, for whatever reason.
And as predicted in the 8 minute mark of Eastwood's speech, no one is talking about how Romney made his case of why he should be President. They're talking about how Dirty Harry went off the rails.
It's a bit harsh, but channeling your inner Abe Simpson for 12 minutes is the wrong way to say "Make my candidate President."
149 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:08:32pm |
re: #145 Bulworth
So saying the number of unemployed people is double what it actually is isn't misinformed?
It's the old saying. One is entitled to an opinion but not their set of the facts. If Clint seriously wants to claim there are twice as much unemployed people as the Department of Labor's statistics suggest, I would like to see him prove it and I trust DoL a lot more than Clint because this is what their job is. It's not his opinions that people have taken fault with. Plus acting as if Afghanistan is Obama's fault alone while ignoring that his own candidate of choice has blasted the proposed drawing down of troops there and eventual withdrawal shows a disregards for the facts. And on a lighter note, disparaging the president as a lawyer while Mitt is a lawyer too.
150 | Coracle Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:09:33pm |
re: #142 Killgore Trout
I'll go a step further and propose that he might not be misinformed or stupid either. I know it seems hard for a lot of people to imagine that some smart well informed people just have different ideas.
Sure. Nothing in his speech really counters that proposition. However Clint chose a crappy vehicle, and didn't give one of the better performances of his career. At least not one good enough to move anyone not already in the Republican tank.
151 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:11:43pm |
re: #145 Bulworth
So saying the number of unemployed people is double what it actually is isn't misinformed?
As I've noted before political speeches, advertisements, press releases etc ofet contain lies and misinformation for public consumption. That's why I keep trying to tell people that Obama doesn't even believe his own campaign ads and neither should anyone else. I don't know Clint, or know what he does or does not know.
152 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:13:23pm |
re: #147 blueraven
Good Lord KT. It is not hard for people to think someone would support Romney, but to suggest that the whole Eastwood episode is not extremely bizarre is just being obtuse.
Sorry, I didn't watch it. I was curious what he might do but from the reports it didn't seem like a serious speech. I'm not that interested.
153 | erik_t Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:13:35pm |
I'd love to stay and chat, really, I'm sure it'll be super fun and interesting but I gotta go chase the Fairy. BBL.
154 | blueraven Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:13:42pm |
I hate to admit it, but I agree with Bill Kystol (gag).
It is very disturbing that someone wanting to be Commander in Chief of the US military failed to mention our troops in Afghanistan in any way.
not even a God Bless, or a thank you...nothing.
155 | blueraven Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:14:18pm |
re: #152 Killgore Trout
Sorry, I didn't watch it. I was curious what he might do but from the reports it didn't seem like a serious speech. I'm not that interested.
then stop commenting if you dont know what you are talking about.
156 | lawhawk Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:14:35pm |
I have no problem with the idea of Clint giving a speech at the RNC. It could have even been entertaining and captivating. He knows how to read lines and come up with something memorable -as he's done with so many characters over his storied career. It could have been a huge advantage as a lede to Romney's acceptance speech.
That wasn't the performance he gave. It was a train-wreck in motion and cringeworthy in many respects, not the least of which is that so many people - pundits, politicians, and lay viewers alike - are focused on Clint more than the acceptance speech by Romney.
#Eastwooding is the new #Tebowing. And I'm sure that there are some at the RNC who wished that they had gone with #Tebow - and so too are some Jet fans (because he can't seem to find the end zone).
157 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:14:39pm |
re: #151 Killgore Trout
As I've noted before political speeches, advertisements, press releases etc ofet contain lies and misinformation for public consumption. That's why I keep trying to tell people that Obama doesn't even believe his own campaign ads and neither should anyone else. I don't know Clint, or know what he does or does not know.
What does that have to do with getting the unemployment numbers wrong? The NYT is reporting that basically Clint went off-script against everyone's wishes. If he's going to erroneously quote unemployment numbers, how is that the fault of Obama's ads?
158 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:15:08pm |
re: #154 blueraven
I hate to admit it, but I agree with Bill Kystol (gag).
It is very disturbing that someone wanting to be Commander in Chief of the US military failed to mention our troops in Afghanistan in any way.
not even a God Bless, or a thank you...nothing.
Romney doesn't believe in military service or experience. Anyone who is really important would have gotten into business.
159 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:15:19pm |
re: #155 blueraven
then stop commenting if you dont know what you are talking about.
Tolerate my diversity.
160 | blueraven Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:16:53pm |
161 | Petero1818 Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:18:12pm |
re: #148 Mattand
The problem is that most people do think of Eastwood as a smart, well-informed guy. That's not the guy who showed up on stage last night, for whatever reason.
And as predicted in the 8 minute mark of Eastwood's speech, no one is talking about Romney made his case of why he should be President. They're talking about how Dirty Harry went of the rails.
It's a bit harsh, but channeling your inner Abe Simpson for 12 minutes is the wrong way to say "Make my candidate President."
Exactly. Clint had a point, and one that likely needed to be told by someone like him. They could have scored big with it. A moderate conservative, someone outside the current political scene with wide appeal who could cut through all the social conservatism and make a case to moderates. It was in there, but it got lost. The point was to reach out to social moderates that are fiscally center or center right and say:
I get it, we all wanted to believe in Obama and had great hopes we wish he could have fulfilled. What the country needs is a turnaround specialist. Mitt is a turnaround specialist a good businessman and a fine family man. Give him a chance.... he can't do much worse and I believe he can do better.
That is what he was trying to say. I don't agree with it, but I can see how that idea will pull some independents. But that is not what anyone is thinking about today. The message was lost. All anyone remembers is an empty chair and a bit of a sad rambling legend of the screen.
162 | Interesting Times Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:18:18pm |
re: #158 Kragar
Romney doesn't believe in military service or experience. Anyone who is really important would have gotten into business.
Cheating has occurred in a Harvard government class. All students involved have been awarded full scholarships to Harvard Business School.— Mark Rapaport (@RapReport) August 31, 2012
163 | gwangung Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:18:43pm |
re: #159 Killgore Trout
Tolerate my diversity.
That's not diversity. That's stupidity.
And that I won't tolerate.
164 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:18:51pm |
re: #159 Killgore Trout
Tolerate my diversity.
You're throwing up a quasi-strawman that people who are criticizing Eastwood and his incoherent speech can't deal with the fact he's for Romney. That's not diversity.
165 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:19:35pm |
re: #144 Kragar
Romney Campaign Embraces Eastwood’s Speech: ‘Classic,’ ‘Descriptive,’ ‘Spoke From The Heart’
Yeah right, like they had any other choice. What were they going to do? Come out and say "What the fuck was that shit, Clint?"
Exactly. What other option did they have?
166 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:19:51pm |
re: #157 Mattand
What does that have to do with getting the unemployment numbers wrong? The NYT is reporting that basically Clint went off-script against everyone's wishes. If he's going to erroneously quote unemployment numbers, how is that the fault of Obama's ads?
I have no idea what the political strategists planned. Just a gimmick to get people to tune in? Generate publicity and headlines the next day? Maybe but I don't think factual accuracy or persuading well informed undecideds was the reason for Clint's performance.
167 | blueraven Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:21:06pm |
re: #166 Killgore Trout
I have no idea what the political strategists planned. Just a gimmick to get people to tune in? Generate publicity and headlines the next day? Maybe but I don't think factual accuracy or persuading well informed undecideds was the reason for Clint's performance.
Exactly what was the reason for his "performance"?
Seems to me it was to create a buzz. It did, and it backfired.
168 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:21:12pm |
re: #166 Killgore Trout
I have no idea what the political strategists planned. Just a gimmick to get people to tune in? Generate publicity and headlines the next day? Maybe but I don't think factual accuracy or persuading well informed undecideds was the reason for Clint's performance.
Then why bring up Obama not believing his own ads? It has nothing to do with Eastwood's speech.
169 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:21:47pm |
Yeah, in public they're not going to say it looked awful. Heck even after the infamous Palin-Couric interview, to the press McCain's team spun for Sarah just as Mitt's team will for Clint, perhaps not as much because Mitt doesn't need Clint as much as McCain needed Sarah for obvious reasons. I bet that Mitt's advisers are really regretting having Clint speak because it totally distracted from their candidate's speech. Between now and the debates, this was the chance for the largest audience to get an idea of who he is and what he's all about. And it's been upstaged by an empty chair.
170 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:22:38pm |
re: #168 Mattand
Then why bring up Obama not believing his own ads? It has nothing to do with Eastwood's speech.
Because shut up.
/
171 | Petero1818 Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:23:02pm |
re: #165 Lidane
Exactly. What other option did they have?
The mystery speaker was actually supposed to be Bruce Willis. However at the last minute his people called and informed us that Mr. Willis was unavailable due to some emergency however they also represented Mr. Eastwood who would be happy to fill in. Regrettably the empty chair and Clint did not have sufficient time to rehearse and get to know each other's timing.
172 | blueraven Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:23:13pm |
re: #168 Mattand
Then why bring up Obama not believing his own ads? It has nothing to do with Eastwood's speech.
You are falling for KTs framing...that Obama doesn't believe his own ads. There is no evidence of this, nor should there be.
173 | Sionainn Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:23:29pm |
re: #135 lawhawk
Ann Romney for one wasn't particularly enthused by Clint's performance. And staffers weren't exactly thrilled either.
Unique is probably the best and most charitable way of seeing that performance.
And it will likely not be repeated - except to mock it in about a week's time - at the DNC.
After Clint's speech, the camera panned to Ryan and his wife who were clapping much less enthusiastically than they had at the beginning before Clint opened his mouth.
174 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:24:06pm |
re: #168 Mattand
Then why bring up Obama not believing his own ads? It has nothing to do with Eastwood's speech.
Because the speaker doesn't always believe what he/she is saying.
175 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:24:51pm |
re: #172 blueraven
You are falling for KTs framing...that Obama doesn't believe his own ads. There is no evidence of this, nor should there be.
Falling for it, no. Questioning a non-sequitir, absolutely.
176 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:25:56pm |
re: #173 Sionainn
After Clint's speech, the camera panned to Ryan and his wife who was clapped much less enthusiastically than they had at the beginning before Clint opened his mouth.
Ann Romney is just describing it as unique and we appreciate all the support we have. I really don't think this speech turned out the way they wanted it to.
177 | lawhawk Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:26:02pm |
re: #166 Killgore Trout
See Petero's comments above. They were trying to repackage Romney as a turnaround specialist who could get America back on a path of economic growth and prosperity. To do so, they needed to convince independents and/or some Obama voters that Obama was a good shot, but he hasn't gotten the job done as well as hoped for and that Romney can do better.
Eastwood could have been that kind of speaker - heck, turning that GM commercial into a plus in the GOP convention (after some on the right wing castigated him for doing the commercial) would have been quite the trick after all.
But Eastwood went off message and it became wrapped in incoherence.
178 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:26:02pm |
re: #172 blueraven
You are falling for KTs framing...that Obama doesn't believe his own ads. There is no evidence of this, nor should there be.
Another shocker: Harry Reid doesn't really believe Mitt paid no taxes for 10 years.
179 | Sionainn Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:27:14pm |
re: #138 Killgore Trout
Factcheck:Muslim Prayer Service at the DNC?
I heard Rush blathering about this the other day. Figured it wasn't true.
180 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:27:16pm |
re: #174 Killgore Trout
Because the speaker doesn't always believe what he/she is saying.
If you watch Eastwood's speech, there's no question he believes what he's saying. Your Obama example makes no sense, other than to introduce a little Magical Balance Fairy to the discussion.
181 | blueraven Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:27:30pm |
re: #178 Killgore Trout
Another shocker: Harry Reid doesn't really believe Mitt paid no taxes for 10 years.
You dont know what Harry Reid thinks. Also, Reid is not Obama.
182 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:27:44pm |
re: #177 lawhawk
See Petero's comments above. They were trying to repackage Romney as a turnaround specialist who could get America back on a path of economic growth and prosperity. To do so, they needed to convince independents and/or some Obama voters that Obama was a good shot, but he hasn't gotten the job done as well as hoped for and that Romney can do better.
Eastwood could have been that kind of speaker - heck, turning that GM commercial into a plus in the GOP convention (after some on the right wing castigated him for doing the commercial) would have been quite the trick after all.
But Eastwood went off message and it became wrapped in incoherence.
I had hoped he was going to give a serious speech. I would have been very interesting in hearing it but it looks like he decided not to do that. Oh well, it looks like a wasted opportunity.
183 | nines09 Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:27:49pm |
re: #173 Sionainn
After Clint's speech, the camera panned to Ryan and his wife who was clapped much less enthusiastically than they had at the beginning before Clint opened his mouth.
Someone should have had a camera on Ann and Mitt the entire Eastwood ramble.
184 | blueraven Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:29:06pm |
re: #178 Killgore Trout
Another shocker: Harry Reid doesn't really believe Mitt paid no taxes for 10 years.
I can say this for certain though. Paul Ryan knows for sure Obama had nothing to do with the closing of the GM factory in Janesville.
185 | abolitionist Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:31:12pm |
re: #169 HappyWarrior
[snip] I bet that Mitt's advisers are really regretting having Clint speak because it totally distracted from their candidate's speech. [snip]
I've suggested that may have been the intent.
186 | engineer cat Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:31:31pm |
re: #178 Killgore Trout
Another shocker: Harry Reid doesn't really believe Mitt paid no taxes for 10 years.
looking for the mythical balance fairy again?
face it: nobody lies like a republican
188 | lawhawk Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:32:55pm |
Romney aides ducking responsibility on who allowed Clint to go on - and then off-script.
“Not me,” said an exasperated-looking senior adviser, when asked who was responsible for Mr. Eastwood’s speech. In late-night interviews, aides variously called the speech “strange” and “weird.” One described it as “theater of the absurd.”
Finger-pointing quickly ensued, suggesting real displeasure and even confusion over the handling of Mr. Eastwood’s performance, which was kept secret until the last minute and offered an off-key message on the night that Mr. Romney accepted the Republican presidential nomination.
A senior Republican involved in convention planning said that Mr. Eastwood’s appearance was cleared by at least two of Mr. Romney’s top advisers, Russ Schriefer and Stuart Stevens. This person said that there had been no rehearsal, to the surprise of the rest of the campaign team.
But another adviser said that several top aides had reviewed talking points given to Mr. Eastwood, which the campaign had discussed with the actor as recently as a few hours before his appearance. Mr. Eastwood, however, delivered those points in a theatrical, and at times crass, way that caught Romney aides off guard, this person said. Mr. Eastwood even ignored warnings that he had exceeded his time.
Mr. Stevens, in an interview, said he would not discuss internal decision making but described Mr. Eastwood’s remarks as improvised.
189 | Interesting Times Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:32:57pm |
re: #187 engineer cat
Both Parties Do
no they don't
True. It's just another BS (i.e. "Both Sides") argument.
190 | AK-47% Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:34:01pm |
re: #178 Killgore Trout
Another shocker: Harry Reid doesn't really believe Mitt paid no taxes for 10 years.
Harry did what he had to do: he kept that albatrosss hung around Mitt's neck...it is not going to go away.
191 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:35:13pm |
re: #184 blueraven
I can say this for certain though. Paul Ryan knows for sure Obama had nothing to do with the closing of the GM factory in Janesville.
Probably. I also suspect he knows his own budget proposal is full of shit and would be an economic disaster if ever enacted.
192 | HappyWarrior Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:35:17pm |
re: #185 abolitionist
I've suggested that may have been the intent.
My cynical side is thinking that's a possibility. More likely to me is that they really do want to try to illustrate their candidate as a decent guy who isn't some out of touch dick and probably hoped that Eastwood and then Rubio's introduction would do that. But as I said, that's a possibility too because after working with Mitt, they know his limitations and personable isn't Mitt, it's just not.
193 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:38:17pm |
re: #185 abolitionist
I've suggested that may have been the intent.
That seems like a huge gamble to take with your boss's run for POTUS. However, given how this campaign is being run, it's not out of the question.
These are the same people who are admitting that they have no qualms about running easily debunked lies in their messaging.
194 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:38:38pm |
Very few people actually believe their own bullshit. It's the true believers like Ron Paul and Michelle Bachman that really scare me.
195 | Interesting Times Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:39:45pm |
Last night Ron Paul was also seen scolding an empty chair. Someone asked him if he was spoofing Eastwood. Ron Paul replied, "No. Why?"— Bob Cesca (@bobcesca_go) August 31, 2012
196 | Sionainn Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:40:16pm |
After numerous attempts and many candy bars later, I finally figured out the "lift and pull here" on a Hershey's chocolate bar.
197 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:41:20pm |
"Chair, you so crazy!"
"..."
"DON'T YOU BACK TALK ME!"
198 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:42:28pm |
re: #196 Sionainn
After numerous attempts and many candy bars later, I finally figured out the "lift and pull here" on a Hershey's chocolate bar.
Its a great day!
Right up there with "Hey, I can turn the shower on and let it get warm before I get into it. GREATEST IDEA EVER!"
199 | Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:42:57pm |
another LOL because it's friday.
200 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:43:13pm |
re: #196 Sionainn
After numerous attempts and many candy bars later, I finally figured out the "lift and pull here" on a Hershey's chocolate bar.
One word: chainsaw.
201 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:44:07pm |
Invisible Obama: Exclusive Q&A with the Internet Sensation -- thanks @invisibleobama! on.mash.to/OOcC7p— Pete Cashmore (@mashable) August 31, 2012
202 | sizzzzlerz Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:44:26pm |
I surprised that no one has brought up the fact Clint starred in a movie musical "Paint Your Wagon" where he sang the song "I Talk To The Trees" with its immortal lyrics:
I talk to the trees
But they don't listen to me
I talk to the stars
But they never hear me
Replace trees with chairs and, well, the song sells itself!
203 | engineer cat Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:44:33pm |
re: #194 Killgore Trout
Very few people actually believe their own bullshit. It's the true believers like Ron Paul and Michelle Bachman that really scare me.
democrats are forever forlornly trotting out rebuttals to republican lies on the faint hope that anybody will notice. the idea that anybody cares about actual reality is one of the biggest problems democrats have in election campaigns
204 | wrenchwench Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:44:41pm |
re: #198 Kragar
Its a great day!
Right up there with "Hey, I can turn the shower on and let it get warm before I get into it. GREATEST IDEA EVER!"
I have one of those single-knob-operated shower controls. If I have my back to it, for the life of me I can't figure out which way to turn it to make the water hotter. It's a special kind of dyslexia.
205 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:45:30pm |
#Eastwooding has gone global:
[Link: www.stumbleupon.com...]
206 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:48:15pm |
Headline is everything: "Romney in New Orleans Asks Where the Water Came From" nationaljournal.com/2012-president...— Maddow Blog (@MaddowBlog) August 31, 2012
207 | darthstar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:48:24pm |
Silly man...it came from god.
HAhaha IMBECILE RT @nationaljournal: In NOLA, Romney asks Did the water come from the sky, or the rivers, or the ocean? njour.nl/Pxy13F— Jeff Gauvin (@JeffersonObama) August 31, 2012
208 | Feline Emperor of the Conservative Waste Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:48:33pm |
re: #199 Brother Holy Cruise Missile of Mild Acceptance
another LOL because it's friday.
"A five-year-old child would understand this budget proposal. Someone go out and get me a five-year-old child!"
209 | Petero1818 Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:49:32pm |
re: #207 darthstar
Silly man...it came from god.
[Embedded content]
The tides come in...the tides go out...repeat.///
210 | b_sharp Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:49:50pm |
Eastwood was hired by the DNC to throw a monkey into the wrench of the RNC.
He pulled it off.
212 | darthstar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:50:07pm |
Mit Romney asks where the water in NOLA came from.Obviously, it came from chair. #insertchair #p2— Sean McCabe (@darthstar99) August 31, 2012
213 | Sionainn Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:50:34pm |
re: #182 Killgore Trout
I had hoped he was going to give a serious speech. I would have been very interesting in hearing it but it looks like he decided not to do that. Oh well, it looks like a wasted opportunity.
How would you know? You didn't watch the speech.
214 | b_sharp Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:50:37pm |
re: #209 Petero1818
The tides come in...the tides go out...repeat.///
You can't explain that, but we did build that.
215 | Gus Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:51:44pm |
re: #214 b_sharp
You can't explain that, but we did build that.
Yep. National Journal said that's what he said but doesn't provide an actual quote so it must be true.
//
216 | engineer cat Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:51:46pm |
someday romney's crack about obama promising to stop the rise of the oceans might come back to bite them in the ass as it's played to remind people of how lightly republicans took the threat
as rush limbaugh's mansion in florida is slowly inundated...
217 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:51:48pm |
Obama reddit AMA update: Obama answers a planted question in his AMA by a user account 4 hours old. Nobody notices/cares.
Profile created mere hours before minutes after the AMA was announced, and literally six seconds before asking a well written, paragraph long question (approximate typing speed assuming it was typed after creating the account? 1570 wpm)
Created a profile 5 minutes 39 seconds after the AMA going live, when servers were having a fit.
Asked question explicitly requesting ways to recruit the youth that Obama relied on last election (many of whom are disillusioned with him, for all the reasons she presents herself as being subject to)
Is literally only 1 of 10 questions answered.
asked by one hmlee who (according to some internet detective work):
has only one comment in her history, total
Posted a blog entry supporting Obama
lists herself as working/having worked as an intern at the Department of JusticeSo, is it possible that she heard about it on her own, created an account, and typed up an eloquent question that is a PR man's wet dream all within less than 6 minutes? Yes, it's possible. It's just not particularly likely.
Outrage!
218 | b_sharp Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:52:02pm |
re: #213 Sionainn
How would you know? You didn't watch the speech.
He knew you were going to say that.
219 | darthstar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:52:03pm |
BTW, the GULF of Mexico isn't an ocean...just saying.
220 | Petero1818 Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:52:22pm |
re: #214 b_sharp
You can't explain that, but we did build that.
Just imagine, before the interwebs these TV moments lived on only in the libraries of networks long forgotten.
221 | darthstar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:52:54pm |
re: #213 Sionainn
How would you know? You didn't watch the speech.
Besides, Romney's not a turn around specialist...he's a reach around specialist.
222 | engineer cat Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:53:32pm |
Romney Requests Presidential Debate To Be Held With Empty Chair
will explain his lack of policies to it
223 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:53:35pm |
re: #213 Sionainn
How would you know? You didn't watch the speech.
8.5 minutes of Clint ad libbing to a chair doesn't sound very serious to me. I suppose I could watch but I'm just not that bored today.
224 | darthstar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:53:51pm |
re: #222 engineer cat
Romney Requests Presidential Debate To Be Held With Empty Chair
will explain his lack of policies to it
He'd lose.
225 | darthstar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:54:20pm |
re: #223 Killgore Trout
8.5 minutes of Clint ad libbing to a chair doesn't sound very serious to me. I suppose I could watch but I'm just not that bored today.
It's as serious as the Romney/Ryan campaign is about policy.
226 | Interesting Times Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:54:34pm |
Mr Gorbachev, Chair Down This Wall!#InsertChair— Bill Talley (@Political_Bill) August 31, 2012
227 | Petero1818 Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:54:39pm |
228 | engineer cat Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:54:50pm |
re: #224 darthstar
He'd lose.
it can be said with certainty that the chair would make fewer unforced errors
229 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:55:10pm |
I'd like to see Romney start to debate an empty chair, then see Obama sneak on stage and sit down while Mitt's back was turned.
230 | Sionainn Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:55:24pm |
231 | Gus Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:55:25pm |
re: #223 Killgore Trout
8.5 minutes of Clint ad libbing to a chair doesn't sound very serious to me. I suppose I could watch but I'm just not that bored today.
I know one thing. I'm pretty bored with this whole skit already. Seriously. Obama isn't going to win over Clint Eastwood talking to a stool. A lot of people loved it. Everyone needs to move on.
232 | Killgore Trout Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:56:25pm |
re: #231 Gus
I know one thing. I'm pretty bored with this whole skit already. Seriously. Obama isn't going to win over Clint Eastwood talking to a stool. A lot of people loved it. Everyone needs to move on.
I new outrage is always just around the corner.
233 | Petero1818 Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:57:01pm |
re: #231 Gus
I know one thing. I'm pretty bored with this whole skit already. Seriously. Obama isn't going to win over Clint Eastwood talking to a stool. A lot of people loved it. Everyone needs to move on.
Disagree. The point being everyone is talking about something other than Mitt's speech. That is worth a lot in an election. Clint is a distraction. Which is fine until Harry Reid starts talking about tax returns again on Tuesday.
234 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:57:04pm |
DNC Commercial: an empty chair, Obama walk up, has a seat "I'm here and ready to talk any time the GOP wants to have a real discussion instead of just talking into empty space."
235 | Gus Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:57:36pm |
re: #232 Killgore Trout
I new outrage is always just around the corner.
Breaking! Romney asks where the water came from!
236 | b_sharp Fri, Aug 31, 2012 12:58:13pm |
According to some unnamed journalist the following was said. 'He then asked, according to a journalists' pool report of the visit: “Did the water come from the sky, or the rivers, or the ocean?”'
That doesn't strike me as an unreasonable question. If, as in the report, he was viewing a flooded area, the question would simply be asking if the torrential rains by themselves were responsible for the flood, or did some engineering fail somewhere leading to water from the ocean or river being the cause.
I think the question may have been more specific than it has been presented. I doubt this is a d'oh moment.
237 | gwangung Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:00:21pm |
re: #236 b_sharp
According to some unnamed journalist the following was said. 'He then asked, according to a journalists' pool report of the visit: “Did the water come from the sky, or the rivers, or the ocean?”'
That doesn't strike me as an unreasonable question. If, as in the report, he was viewing a flooded area, the question would simply be asking if the torrential rains by themselves were responsible for the flood, or did some engineering fail somewhere leading to water from the ocean or river being the cause.
I think the question may have been more specific than it has been presented. I doubt this is a d'oh moment.
Ah, that seems more reasonable.
238 | Gus Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:01:02pm |
re: #233 Petero1818
Disagree. The point being everyone is talking about something other than Mitt's speech. That is worth a lot in an election. Clint is a distraction. Which is fine until Harry Reid starts talking about tax returns again on Tuesday.
People are working today or watching soap operas. Most people will just say "I heard Clint Eastwood did something weird at the RNC last night." The majority of Americans either don't know who Harry Reid is and a good 50 percent don't care about what he says.
239 | Interesting Times Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:01:34pm |
re: #236 b_sharp
According to some unnamed journalist the following was said. 'He then asked, according to a journalists' pool report of the visit: “Did the water come from the sky, or the rivers, or the ocean?”'
If nothing else, it just looks horrendously bad when coupled with his "durr hurr, I don't care about the planet I care about you!" crap from yesterday. It underscores that republicans are an absolute disaster for disaster victims.
241 | Interesting Times Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:03:34pm |
America ought to be proud that one ideological side has no idea how global warming, hurricanes or lunar cycles affect ocean levels.— Danielle Blake (@DCPlod) August 31, 2012
242 | Lidane Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:03:42pm |
re: #231 Gus
I know one thing. I'm pretty bored with this whole skit already. Seriously. Obama isn't going to win over Clint Eastwood talking to a stool. A lot of people loved it. Everyone needs to move on.
Thing is, this was supposed to be Mitt Romney's moment. The guy's been running for POTUS for the better part of the decade, finally gets the nod, and is set to have his moment in front of the world where he accepts the nomination for President from his party. The only takeaway from that night that everyone is talking about is Clint Eastwood yelling at an empty chair.
That's huge. A nominee for a major party has been upstaged and overshadowed by an empty chair, and right before the incumbent POTUS goes into his convention. This should be the time when Romney is the center of attention for his speech, and he has to compete with Invisible Obama and Old Man Yells At Chair for press.
243 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:04:27pm |
re: #239 Interesting Times
If nothing else, it just looks horrendously bad when coupled with his "durr hurr, I don't care about the planet I care about you!" crap from yesterday. It underscores that republicans are an absolute disaster for disaster victims.
"logic algorithms have computed that touring disaster site is rated as highly probable human behavior for Job_President@US. Execute tour routine."
244 | Interesting Times Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:05:06pm |
re: #242 Lidane
Plus this:
GALLUP: Obama 47, Romney 46. bit.ly/JG7Sv INTRADE: Obama 57, Romney 43. bit.ly/dIcTro/ No #rnc2012 bounce so far.— Jeff DeWitt (@jeffersondewitt) August 31, 2012
245 | Varek Raith Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:05:38pm |
246 | Kragar Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:06:52pm |
re: #245 Varek Raith
Mitt Romney Calls United States A ‘Company’
Heh.
Mitt can't wait to fire Americans who don't meet production goals.
247 | Mattand Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:07:26pm |
re: #242 Lidane
Thing is, this was supposed to be Mitt Romney's moment. The guy's been running for POTUS for the better part of the decade, finally gets the nod, and is set to have his moment in front of the world where he accepts the nomination for President from his party. The only takeaway from that night that everyone is talking about is Clint Eastwood yelling at an empty chair.
That's huge. A nominee for a major party has been upstaged and overshadowed by an empty chair, and right before the incumbent POTUS goes into his convention. This should be the time when Romney is the center of attention for his speech, and he has to compete with Invisible Obama and Old Man Yells At Chair for press.
Spot on. It's been less than 24 hours since this happened. It's a little early to call a moratorium on Chairgate yet.
248 | Sionainn Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:11:40pm |
re: #236 b_sharp
According to some unnamed journalist the following was said. 'He then asked, according to a journalists' pool report of the visit: “Did the water come from the sky, or the rivers, or the ocean?”'
That doesn't strike me as an unreasonable question. If, as in the report, he was viewing a flooded area, the question would simply be asking if the torrential rains by themselves were responsible for the flood, or did some engineering fail somewhere leading to water from the ocean or river being the cause.
I think the question may have been more specific than it has been presented. I doubt this is a d'oh moment.
I agree...although I did find the headline amusing. It's the same thing Fox News does on a regular basis.
249 | MittDoesNotCompute Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:13:11pm |
re: #140 HappyWarrior
Sadly, yes. I mean Clint doesn't have to support Obama's re-election. If he feels he hasn't done a good job but why say you don't give a shit about gays being able to marry when you're giving a speech on national television in support of a man who supports banning it everywhere (not just states having the choice) or that you don't like what happened in Afghanistan all the while Mitt talks a tough game on Iran and has in the past criticized the strength and muscle of the president's Afghanistan policy. Clint's entitled to his opinions and to support whoever he wants but I don't get why he's supporting Mitt. He really seems like Gary Johnson would be more his type.
Because Clint knows Johnson didn't and doesn't have a snowball's chance in Hell...
250 | sagehen Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:14:13pm |
re: #242 Lidane
Thing is, this was supposed to be Mitt Romney's moment. The guy's been running for POTUS for the better part of the decade, finally gets the nod, and is set to have his moment in front of the world where he accepts the nomination for President from his party. The only takeaway from that night that everyone is talking about is Clint Eastwood yelling at an empty chair.
That's huge. A nominee for a major party has been upstaged and overshadowed by an empty chair, and right before the incumbent POTUS goes into his convention. This should be the time when Romney is the center of attention for his speech, and he has to compete with Invisible Obama and Old Man Yells At Chair for press.
What the Morning Joe people were freaked about is that Romney's speech was supposed to start just after 10 because that's when the TV audience suddenly doubles. All those people just tuning in got... a rambling Clint Eastwood who'd gone 8 minutes over on what was scheduled to be a 3-minute thing. Ooops.
For low-information voters just starting to pay attention to the campaigns, this was their first impression of Romney.
251 | Gus Fri, Aug 31, 2012 1:18:33pm |
re: #242 Lidane
Thing is, this was supposed to be Mitt Romney's moment. The guy's been running for POTUS for the better part of the decade, finally gets the nod, and is set to have his moment in front of the world where he accepts the nomination for President from his party. The only takeaway from that night that everyone is talking about is Clint Eastwood yelling at an empty chair.
That's huge. A nominee for a major party has been upstaged and overshadowed by an empty chair, and right before the incumbent POTUS goes into his convention. This should be the time when Romney is the center of attention for his speech, and he has to compete with Invisible Obama and Old Man Yells At Chair for press.
Well yeah. I didn't say it was a good moment either. In the end this whole skit upstaged Romney and Romney made a weak speech. I highly doubt any of this will sway any swing voters. The war mongering by Romney will likely scare off at least 1/2 of independents especially the Paulian types. It was a big mistake IMO. Of course it could have been worse had that nut Donald Trump was going to be there. Worst part of the finale was Romney making jokes about climate change and all the sabre rattling.